The desire to understand human nature and existence fuels the debate on the soul and its relationship to the body. Its location and function are issues worth evaluating. The debate started long ago with Aristotle and Plato trying to explain its fate when a person dies. So, do we have a soul? Let us take the next few paragraphs to find an answer.
Other names used to describe the concept of the soul are mind and spirit. Their similarity lies in the fact that they are both untouchable and invisible. However, the mind is said to refer more to intelligence with the spirit dealing with feelings. The search for an answer has sucked in biologists, metaphysics and religion.
According to different religious believes the spirit enters the body at creation and comes from God. The bible records that God breathe life into the molded clay. This is translated to be point where human beings draw their spirit from. As such, it lives and defines a person for the duration he or she is alive. It is the carrier of principles of morality and therefore is rewarded or condemned for good or bad deeds by God in the afterlife.
In ancient civilizations, Plato argued that human souls resided in the body when people are alive. Upon death, it flies away leaving the flesh to decompose. Aristotle on the other hand insisted that souls die with bodies making them one and the same existence. There is yet to be clarity on what happens when one dies and what form the spirit takes.
When the discussion shifts to animals having or not having souls, it becomes confusing. Some theories suggest that they also have feelings and think like human beings. The fact that their life cycles are similar to that of human beings is worth noting. While they are considered less intelligent, they also display an existence beyond the physical. Could this suggest that souls are not only reserved for human beings?
According to biologists, there is more to life than physical cells. They contend that this is the factor that differentiates a dead and living being. In that light, they acknowledge the existence of a form that is not physical and that could be used to describe human beings. Biologists explain human movement as impulse from the brain but while that is physical and tangible, there is a dimension that cannot be explained in physical terms.
The fate of souls and how they find their way into bodies is another point of discussion. According to religious teachings, souls come from God with a responsibility to guide morality. They also control the enjoyment of pleasure and guilt feeling. This could therefore be the element that sets human beings apart from animals. This is an indirect confirmation of existence.
The existence of souls is not in doubt regardless of the theory one uses to explain it. By stitching the theories together, souls appear to be the defining factor in human existence and the instructor to be rational and considerate to humanity. The debate is when it enters the body, when it exits and its fate at death. The conclusion that souls exist in humanity is therefore confirmed.
Other names used to describe the concept of the soul are mind and spirit. Their similarity lies in the fact that they are both untouchable and invisible. However, the mind is said to refer more to intelligence with the spirit dealing with feelings. The search for an answer has sucked in biologists, metaphysics and religion.
According to different religious believes the spirit enters the body at creation and comes from God. The bible records that God breathe life into the molded clay. This is translated to be point where human beings draw their spirit from. As such, it lives and defines a person for the duration he or she is alive. It is the carrier of principles of morality and therefore is rewarded or condemned for good or bad deeds by God in the afterlife.
In ancient civilizations, Plato argued that human souls resided in the body when people are alive. Upon death, it flies away leaving the flesh to decompose. Aristotle on the other hand insisted that souls die with bodies making them one and the same existence. There is yet to be clarity on what happens when one dies and what form the spirit takes.
When the discussion shifts to animals having or not having souls, it becomes confusing. Some theories suggest that they also have feelings and think like human beings. The fact that their life cycles are similar to that of human beings is worth noting. While they are considered less intelligent, they also display an existence beyond the physical. Could this suggest that souls are not only reserved for human beings?
According to biologists, there is more to life than physical cells. They contend that this is the factor that differentiates a dead and living being. In that light, they acknowledge the existence of a form that is not physical and that could be used to describe human beings. Biologists explain human movement as impulse from the brain but while that is physical and tangible, there is a dimension that cannot be explained in physical terms.
The fate of souls and how they find their way into bodies is another point of discussion. According to religious teachings, souls come from God with a responsibility to guide morality. They also control the enjoyment of pleasure and guilt feeling. This could therefore be the element that sets human beings apart from animals. This is an indirect confirmation of existence.
The existence of souls is not in doubt regardless of the theory one uses to explain it. By stitching the theories together, souls appear to be the defining factor in human existence and the instructor to be rational and considerate to humanity. The debate is when it enters the body, when it exits and its fate at death. The conclusion that souls exist in humanity is therefore confirmed.
About the Author:
If you are pondering the age old question "do we have a soul?" come to lifeageingandbeyond.com. You'll find a wide variety of blog topics on important subjects when you visit http://www.lifeageingandbeyond.com right now.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire